Home » Apple defends ban on apps outside the App Store, detailing Android malware issues

Apple defends ban on apps outside the App Store, detailing Android malware issues

In context: Amid an antitrust investigation against Apple by EU regulators, as well as the discussion generated afterwards on the matter, the iPhone maker released a 31-page report defending why its iOS ecosystem is limited. at the App Store. The tech giant is trying to justify its refusal to allow sideloading of apps on their smartphones by pointing out how Android has been heavily exploited by malware.

Apple’s report, “Building a Trusted Ecosystem for Millions of Apps – An Analysis of the Sideloading Threat,” points out that support for sideloading through direct downloads and third-party app stores ” would cripple “iPhone’s privacy and security protections, exposing users to” serious security risks. “

“IPhone is a highly personal device where users store some of their most sensitive and personal information. This means that maintaining security and privacy on the iOS ecosystem is of critical importance to users, ”said Apple. “However, some require Apple to support the distribution of apps outside of the App Store, through direct downloads or third-party app stores, a process also known as ‘sideloading’.

The European Commission’s antitrust charges against Apple claim that the company violated EU competition rules relating to policies associated with the App Store. The case was sparked by a complaint from the music streaming service Spotify.

In an effort to alleviate concerns about the monopoly Apple has established on iOS, he pointed out that security concerns are rampant for Android because Google’s operating system allows for sideloading. Specifically, Apple points out that “over the past four years, Android devices have had 15 to 47 times more malware infections than the iPhone.”

Another statistic used in the report was that nearly six million attacks per month were detected by a large security company on its customers’ Android mobile devices. If Apple was forced to support sideloading, it said cybercriminals would inevitably target iPhone users through harmful apps. Users would also have less information about the apps in advance, Apple says, because external app stores would not be “required to provide the information displayed on the app’s product pages and privacy labels. Store “.

Some may consider that Apple makes a valid point considering how Android malware has become a significant security issue for the operating system. For example, a Trojan horse found in 200 malicious apps on the Google Play Store and third-party app stores infected millions of devices, extracting tens of millions of dollars from the victims. Because of the open platform Android is based on, security firm Eset claims it is more “interesting” to cybercriminals than iOS.

However, others can counter this by showing that it is in Apple’s financial best interests to reject sideloading – Apple generates tens of billions of dollars from the 30% reduction it takes developers on the market. ‘App Store for the initial payment of paid applications, in addition to in-app purchases. He might be ready to enjoy this significant slice of income for at least a few more years due to an appeal in his Epic Games lawsuit.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay on Top - Get the daily news in your inbox

Trending this Week